i don’t like this at all. i really don’t. I’m a little too drunk to get into right now, but while i read the article and ultimately understand what i’m seeing here, i dont think its a very good depiction of the nature of the problem. you can tell by the loop that they’re restricting themselves, and the diagram isn’t good enough to show us how the variables are really working, because we don’t see lines delineating where in the cube the dots are lying. the 2d nature graphics are a real hinderance here, and i think good ole casey stella coulda done way better. in conclusion, this cube is gay. it should fuck other cubes and not spheres like regular cubes would.
oh I didn’t post it up in admiration I’m calling bullshit on the so called “chaotic” movement of the theory. The animated model is clearly flawed but it smartens up the homepage of illOp a little bit, haha.
2006 The Institute of Illogical Operation. 
i don’t like this at all. i really don’t. I’m a little too drunk to get into right now, but while i read the article and ultimately understand what i’m seeing here, i dont think its a very good depiction of the nature of the problem. you can tell by the loop that they’re restricting themselves, and the diagram isn’t good enough to show us how the variables are really working, because we don’t see lines delineating where in the cube the dots are lying. the 2d nature graphics are a real hinderance here, and i think good ole casey stella coulda done way better. in conclusion, this cube is gay. it should fuck other cubes and not spheres like regular cubes would.
oh I didn’t post it up in admiration
I’m calling bullshit on the so called “chaotic” movement of the theory.
The animated model is clearly flawed but it smartens up the homepage of illOp a little bit, haha.